> That’s how it read. Which is what my previous comment responded to. My problem with your previous comment is that it was written after my clarificatory reply

> That’s how it read. Which is what my previous comment responded to. My problem with your previous comment is that it was written after my clarificatory reply to you, and indeed after your reply to that, so you obviously read my clarificatory reply, but instead of revising your initial interpretation based on my clarification, you chose, for whatever reason, to repeat the initial misinterpretation.