3 ms·
Now I wonder how much performance is being left on the table elsewhere in the OpenSSL codebase...
by some_furry 9mo ago
Now I wonder how much performance is being left on the table elsewhere in the OpenSSL codebase...
- Avamander 9mo agoGiven the massive regression with 3.x alone, you'll probably be happier if you don't know :/
- Xraider72 9mo agohaproxy has an article on the subject https://www.haproxy.com/blog/state-of-ssl-stacks https://www.haproxy.com/blog/state-of-ssl-stacks TLDR - on the TLS parts, quite a lot, up to 2x slower on certain paths. Amusingly, openssl 1.1 was much faster. libcrypto tends to be quite solid though, though over the years, other libraries have collected weird SIMD optimizations that enable them to beat openssl by healthy margins.