4 ms·
However, there's a huge leap in productivity between having an editor whose keybinds you know (and can use without a mouse), and one which you have extended wit
by gknoy 14y ago
However, there's a huge leap in productivity between having an editor whose keybinds you know (and can use without a mouse), and one which you have extended with extensive macros. That's like the difference between an out-of-the-box Emacs and SLIME.
Your Vim setup is awesome, but for a newbie to vim like me, it'll take a long time before I'm more productive using it -- not only would I need to internalize the keybinds and text processing tools, but I would also then have to start adding custom scripts and stuff, in order to do other things. (run unit tests, evaluate a block of code in an interpreter, etc)
- mdwrigh2 14y agoThe comparison was between someone who is skilled at vim and someone who is skilled at Sublime Text 2. My argument is that the person using Sublime Text 2 wouldn't be as "fast" as the person using vim, not that the person who was skilled at Sublime Text 2 would be as fast as me using my VIM setup, which is what you're talking about. I agree, that would be a ridiculous argument.