4 ms·
Again, the first shot could be ruled to be justified, but the second and third were indisputably after the officer was out of harms way. There's also unanswere
by packetlost 9mo ago
Again, the first shot could be ruled to be justified, but the second and third were indisputably after the officer was out of harms way.
There's also unanswered questions about jurisdiction and whether the officers were acting within the scope of their duties, which would also be a major factor in the justification for use of force.