> I guess that's what the founding fathers intended. This... seems unlikely. It had already been established that _kings_ could be removed for doing crimes (se

> I guess that's what the founding fathers intended. This... seems unlikely. It had already been established that _kings_ could be removed for doing crimes (see Charles I, who, ah, lost his head) by the time the US was founded; it seems unlikely that they'd have intended the US president be less accountable than a king.