4 ms·
I'm still a bit sceptical of this. Metro only allows you to work with one app on the screen at a time and you have to hit start every time you want to switch ap
by jiggy2011 14y ago
I'm still a bit sceptical of this. Metro only allows you to work with one app on the screen at a time and you have to hit start every time you want to switch apps instead of a taskbar.
If people want to use their desktop computers in such a way, why didn't they build the UI this way years ago?
- barrkel 14y agoThey did. It was called dosshell; it sucked (for various reasons). Arguably things like screen in a terminal can be interpreted the same way. It's still a very awkward way of multitasking.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- sukuriant 14y agoIn Metro mode, you can have an application running and another application running on the side. [1] [1] http://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/windows-8-consumer-preview-flow-then-bing.jpg http://www.digitaltrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/wind...
- Karunamon 14y agoSo 2 at a time. Meanwhile I have.. counts 24 windows open across 9 different applications.
- sukuriant 14y agoThat you're looking at at the same time?
- Karunamon 14y agoI've long since opened and closed things since last comment, but I've got lets see.. 5 windows visible on my screen right now. This browser, a XenCenter session, an IRC client, a script for that IRC client, and a miniaturized iTunes. 2 is such an absurdly low limit as to be virtually useless.