Gawker are ridiculous. They've written a few paragraphs rewording the original article and then quoted 1/2 the article to wrap it up: http://www.guardian.co.u

Gawker are ridiculous. They've written a few paragraphs rewording the original article and then quoted 1/2 the article to wrap it up: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/15/pacific-iron-fertilisation-geoengineering http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/15/pacific-ir... Edit: Yay someone fixed it.