3 ms·
But you are still relying on them to name the branch in such a way it encodes that info. It is unclear why this is superior to messages in commits.
by pluralmonad 9mo ago
But you are still relying on them to name the branch in such a way it encodes that info. It is unclear why this is superior to messages in commits.
- globular-toast 9mo agoIt's worse than that: the branch name is lost after a merge. That "merge branch xyz" is simply the default commit message. So it doesn't matter what you do, commit messages are all you have!