4 ms·
It's the problem that the whole industry is facing - the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline, and comp
by anticorporate 9mo ago
It's the problem that the whole industry is facing - the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline, and companies that want to keep milking us for money regularly need to find a new way to do it.
- no_wizard 9mo agoSufficient for whom? At my job they’re still refreshing workstations regularly. They buy and churn hardware on a regular basis. Not quite “buying on release week” basis but some % of employees always getting new hardware at max specs in the design org Makes even engineering jealous sometimes
- alwillis 9mo ago> the current generation of hardware is sufficient that hardware refreshes will continue to decline If anything, Apple is refreshing their hardware much faster now compared to the Intel days. There's literally a new MacBook Pro and MacBook Air every year. And of course there are 3-4 new iPhones every year.
- anticorporate 9mo agoBy declining hardware refreshes, I meant on the consumer side, not the producer side.
- rstupek 9mo agoI hate subscriptions as much as the next person but how would you pay for continued development of software? Do you say a person can continue to run version X forever but if they want a new version they pay for it?
- anticorporate 9mo ago> Do you say a person can continue to run version X forever but if they want a new version they pay for it? I'm not particularly interested in sustaining the financial growth of software companies. I did that for years and I'm done. But, what you suggest is literally what the software industry did for decades before subscriptions became the norm.