> I agree with the principle that trial should be where the crime is committed but this isn't a clear cut case for that criteria and there is in my view a stron

> I agree with the principle that trial should be where the crime is committed but this isn't a clear cut case for that criteria and there is in my view a strong argument that the crime took place in the US (the computers he misused were there and he knew it) even though Gary was in the UK. Indeed. It's no different to firing a rocket over an international border.