Here's some of the video, as part of a wider analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDda-L_ZOE8&t=5m56s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDda-L_ZOE8&t=5m56s

Here's some of the video, as part of a wider analysis: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDda-L_ZOE8&t=5m56s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDda-L_ZOE8&t=5m56s At 6:55 (in slow motion) we see the officer in front of the car, recording with his own phone. 7:01, the car moves forward and the wheel can clearly be seen to spin as the car struggles to gain traction. There is a clear attempt to accelerate sharply. 7:23, some explanation: "As you can see, the officer has his gun out, the tires are still pointed directly at the officer, and the car is moving forward.... the officer is struck by the vehicle, which you cannot see from this angle." (But if you take the full speed video frame by frame, around 6:38 you can clearly see for multiple frames that the officer is taken off balance and takes a while to recover. Then there's more footage from in front of the car. At 7:53 you can see the impact plain as day. That's a CNN analyst saying: "Well, the slowed-down version is showing me that when the SUV pulls forward, they make contact with the agent in the street, and then immediately following that contact, you hear three gunshots follow." (Sound sync is an issue with video like this and it makes far more sense to me that the shots are concurrent with, or immediately before impact. They cannot feasibly be any kind of revenge for being hit because it would be utterly impossible to aim.) "Contact" is an understatement given the video; you can clearly see that the officer is leaning considerably forward over the hood of the SUV as a direct consequence of the impact. All of this is also corroborated by the officer's own cell phone footage, wherein he completely loses control of the camera as a consequence.