4 ms·
> With highly specific intentions Intentions to pull the CSAM out of the server full of CSAM that twitter is running. Yes, you are making the flailing argumen
by mullingitover 9mo ago
> With highly specific intentions
Intentions to pull the CSAM out of the server full of CSAM that twitter is running.
Yes, you are making the flailing argument that the operators of the CSAM site desperately want to establish as the false but dominant narrative.
If you have a database full of CSAM, and investigators write queries with specific intentions, and results show that there is CSAM in your database: you have a database full of CSAM. Now substitute 'model' for 'database.'
- themafia 9mo agoGrok enables their behavior. An investigator does not _create novel child porn_ in doing a query. You're making a fallacious argument.
- mullingitover 9mo ago> An investigator does not _create novel child porn_ in doing a query. And a prompt, without being aided and abetted by twitter, doesn't "create novel child porn" either. A prompt is essentially searching the space, and in the model operated by twitter it's yielding CSAM which is then being distributed to the world. If twitter were operating in good faith, even if this was the fault of its customers, it would shut the CSAM generator operation down until it could get a handle on the rampant criminal activity on its platform.