3 ms·
Great option. I was waiting for such an option. Another problem I have is that I keep scanning the front page list of references to see if a new article popped
by chmike 14y ago
Great option. I was waiting for such an option.
Another problem I have is that I keep scanning the front page list of references to see if a new article popped in somewhere in the list between the last time I checked.
This is inefficient. My impression is that providing a list of references sorted by the time they reached the threshold would do the trick. Though, this would require a significant amount of work to produce. Being able to precompute the sorted list and share it with many users would allow to cache it.
So I raise the question if it is not preferable to propose predefined threshold values. How much difference would it make to have a threshold at 55 and 54 anyway.
Let say you propose a treshold at 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100 for example, the pages could be precomputed and cached.
A script on the browser side could keep track of the last references seen and show older articles in gray for instance.
- pooriaazimi 14y agohttp://hckrnews.com http://hckrnews.com is all you need.
- lleims 14y agoThat's the exact reason why I use hckrnews.com - to be able to easily figure out what's rising to the top and also to have the most popular threads in chronological order.