4 ms·
If curl is used by hackers in illegal activity, culpability falls on the hackers, not the maintainers of curl. If I ask the maintainers of curl to hack somethi
by nkrisc 10mo ago
If curl is used by hackers in illegal activity, culpability falls on the hackers, not the maintainers of curl.
If I ask the maintainers of curl to hack something and they do it, then they are culpable (and possibly me as well).
Using Photoshop to do something doesn’t make Adobe complicit because Adobe isn’t involved in what you’re using Photoshop for. I suppose they could involve themselves, if you’d prefer that.
- simianwords 10mo agoso why is the culpability on grok?
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- immibis 10mo agoBecause Grok posts child porn, which is illegal. Section 230 doesn't apply, since the child porn is clearly posted by Grok.
- simianwords 10mo agowhere did grok post child porn?
- immibis 10mo agoX, formerly Twitter.