3 ms·
The quality is absolutely part of the issue. Imagine the difference between a nude stick figure labeled your mom, and a photorealistic, explicit deepfake of yo
by buellerbueller 9mo ago
The quality is absolutely part of the issue. Imagine the difference between a nude stick figure labeled your mom, and a photorealistic, explicit deepfake of your mom.
Do you find the two equally objectionable?
- XorNot 9mo agoWell also in context the stick figure could still constitute sexual harassment. If a big boobed stick figure with a label saying "<coworker name>" was being posted on your social media a lot such that people could clearly interpret who you were talking about, there would be a case for harassment but also you'd probably just get fired anyway.
- latexr 9mo agoYes, but in that case everyone would understand the image is a crude depiction of someone—judging the poster—and not a real photograph—judging and embarrasing the target.
- themafia 9mo agoWell, if we just guarantee that we put "AI Generated" at the bottom of those images, it will be clear it's not a real photograph, and then this problem disappears?
- latexr 9mo agoIt’s impossible to guarantee that. As soon as you add that message, someone will build a solution to remove the message. That’s exactly what happened with OpenAi’s Sora.
- themafia 9mo agoYou've avoiding the question. Assume there is a technical solution that makes these generates images always obvious as generated. Where is the actual problem? Is it that it's realistic? Or that the behavior of the person creating it is harassing? This is pretty straight forward.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]
- latexr 9mo ago[dead]
- buellerbueller 9mo agoIt is pretty straightforward: the problem is both.