3 ms·
CAD and machining are different fields, true, but I see a lot of the same flaws that Adam Karvonen highlighted in his essay on LLM-aided machining a few months
by OgsyedIE 9mo ago
CAD and machining are different fields, true, but I see a lot of the same flaws that Adam Karvonen highlighted in his essay on LLM-aided machining a few months ago:
https://adamkarvonen.github.io/machine_learning/2025/04/13/llm-manufacturing-eval.html https://adamkarvonen.github.io/machine_learning/2025/04/13/l...
Do any people with familiarity on what's under the hood know if the latent space produced by most transformer paradigms is only capable of natively simulating 1-d reasoning and has to kludge together any process for figuring geometry with more degrees of freedom?
- CamperBob2 9mo agoWell, they couldn't generate 2D artwork if they weren't capable of working with multiple output dimensions. An interesting thing about transformers is that they are world-class at compressing 2D image data even when not trained on anything but textual language ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10668 https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10668 ). Whether that notion is relevant for 3D content would be two or three figures over my pay grade, though.
- Otterly99 9mo agoCommenting on the link you provided: is using a LLM the right approach for this? Why not train a specified model to generate accurate CAD drawings, rather than offloading the task to some LLM that, while it might have some knowledge of machining or CAD conception, will probably fail, because that is not really what it was built for.