6 ms·
1) Cry me a river about bloody dictators being deposed, wah wah. 2) Nobody is asking to "accept Israel's dominance", but dropping the "Destruction of Israel" a
by neoromantique 9mo ago
1) Cry me a river about bloody dictators being deposed, wah wah.
2) Nobody is asking to "accept Israel's dominance", but dropping the "Destruction of Israel" as one of the main goals of the state would be a quite welcome.
The world does not revolve around Israel, and the less bloody dictators it has (theocratic or not) the better.
- submeta 9mo ago[flagged]
- neoromantique 9mo agoIf Israel were to be magically relocated to the moon or mars or 'the sea', region would resume the explosion of local wars, now that common enemy briefly uniting them is gone.
- everdrive 9mo agoAsk yourself why Jordan or Egypt are not tripping over themselves to accept Palestinian refugees.
- lbrito 9mo agoIf someone invades your neighbours' homes and kicks them out, you would be eager to collaborate and host them in your home indefinitely, yes?
- neoromantique 9mo agoor maybe it has something to do with past events (of when they did let them in the past)? Noo, can't be.
- everdrive 9mo agoNations aren't homes, and specifically the West Bank was previously part of Transjordan, while the Gaza Strip was previously part of Egypt.
- submeta 9mo agoWhy should they? Palestinians have a home. Jordan consists of majority palestinians. Why should they take in Palestinians? Besides Egypt and Jordan are puppet regimes, paid for by the West. They receive billions for weapons annually. One dicatator and another monarch suppressing their people and getting weapons and intelligence in return.