4 ms·
What makes you think Meta will do a better job of policing this than the actual police? Granted, they might be able to crack down harder in some respects since
by Ajedi32 10mo ago
What makes you think Meta will do a better job of policing this than the actual police?
Granted, they might be able to crack down harder in some respects since unlike the police they don't have to worry about due process, but is that really "doing a better job" on balance?
- Nextgrid 10mo agoThe police doesn't have access to all the data for starters. Meta does.
- Ajedi32 10mo agoThese are public posts we're talking about, right? Or are we saying Meta should be cracking down on content in private communication too? (And if so, isn't that the same concern I just mentioned about due process, but for privacy instead?)
- Nextgrid 10mo agoIf we're talking about profiting from fraud, then we're talking ads. Which are semi-public, you only see them if you fall within the targeting bucket, which definitely wouldn't include "law enforcement officer".
- Ajedi32 10mo agoThey profit from regular posts too, since those usually have ads next to them. But fair point.
- simion314 10mo ago>What makes you think Meta will do a better job of policing this than the actual police? Meta announce they will stop political/electoral advertising in EU, so this ios proof that Meta can do but we need to foce them to act, otherwise Meta makes money from all the scams in the ads that are published, in fact I remember Meta looked into the scam problem and decided to stop looking sicne solving the problem would reduce their profits. Now in case all those well paid engineers at Meta can't find a solution here is an idea I had just by thinking at it for a few seconds, those geniuses shoudl be able to find better ones if they want. 1 when a scam ad is reported block that account and their ads 2 before the ad is published have an AI scan it, if it looks to be related to politics, crypto or other scam friendly domains have someone review it . do not allow fresh accounts to publish this kind of shit without a human review 3 for Facebook content when someone shares fake shiot, like a proven fake document, or scam or faked video block the account and then notify all the people that liked or shared the scam that they were scammed/tricked ... when your users will get 10 daily notifications "You are an idiot you shared this fake shit" you might realize you should do something about scams or users will stop engaging with your stuff. I am talking here about proveable scams and fakes , so not about some gray area. I mean scams, faked videos/images/documents etc
- pjc50 10mo agoBanning some fraudulent advertising is doing a better job than leaving it up, yes.
- autoexec 10mo agoBecause it'd give companies like Meta has a strong incentive to stop profiting from it or else people start getting fined/jailed. It also addresses the problem at (what is often) the source. Police in Ireland don't have the ability to march into Facebook's server rooms and start removing posts, so requests have to be made to Meta anyway which takes additional time. Making Facebook clean up their own mess directly would mean cutting out the middle man and all the red tape and hoops police have jump though to get them to take action.