> I think infinite churn is the point. That would require the LLVM devs to be stupid and/or evil. As that is not the case, your supposition is not true either.

> I think infinite churn is the point. That would require the LLVM devs to be stupid and/or evil. As that is not the case, your supposition is not true either. They might be willing to accept churn in the service of other goals, but they don't have churn as a goal unto itself.