3 ms·
The point of my comment was that the AI/LLM is almost irrelevant in light of low quality search engine APIs/indexes. Is there a way to validate the actual quali
by yunohn 9mo ago
The point of my comment was that the AI/LLM is almost irrelevant in light of low quality search engine APIs/indexes. Is there a way to validate the actual quality and comprehensiveness of YaCY beyond anecdata?
- embedding-shape 9mo ago> Is there a way to validate the actual quality and comprehensiveness of YaCY beyond anecdata? No, because it's your own index essentially, hence the "the quality/experience is pretty much up to you" part.
- yunohn 9mo agoYeah, that’s not really reassuring nor indicative of its usefulness or value.
- embedding-shape 9mo agoYeah, if that's how you feel about your own abilities, then I guess that's the way it is. Not sure what that has to do with YaCy or my original comment.
- yunohn 9mo agoRespectfully, you said: > YaCy does a pretty good job I assume that should be qualified with some basic amount of evidence beyond “I said so”? Anyways, thanks for pointing me in the direction of YaCy, will try it out.
- immibis 9mo agoHow to build a search engine, apparently: 1. Install YaCy 2. Draw the rest of the owl