3 ms·
I disagree that Mercurial was better. For example Git was always much faster.
by jhasse 9mo ago
I disagree that Mercurial was better. For example Git was always much faster.
- megapoliss 9mo agoI remember that: for repos ~ 1Gb Mercurial just became unusable. It took half of day just to clone the repo.
- btreecat 9mo agoThat sounds like y'all may have been storing binary blobs and large files with out the right plugins setup.
- megapoliss 9mo agoJust rename root directory of project and double size of your repo Mercurial didn't supported rename, and did delete/add instead, so size of repo grows pretty fast