3 ms·
This is not an either/or discussion. I see what you mean, that there is a very tangible difference between the current two candidates. On the other hand, two is
by andreasvc 14y ago
This is not an either/or discussion. I see what you mean, that there is a very tangible difference between the current two candidates. On the other hand, two is a very limited choice. A lot of first world countries have multi-party systems and have some form of social democracy. Perhaps if it weren't for the first-past-the-post electoral system, the US might be a social democracy as well.
- drivebyacct2 14y ago>On the other hand, two is a very limited choice. Oh I certainly agree.