3 ms·
you are learning what it takes to keep a machine up and running. You still witness the breakage. You can still watch the fix. You can review what happened. What
by enos_feedler 9mo ago
you are learning what it takes to keep a machine up and running. You still witness the breakage. You can still watch the fix. You can review what happened. What you are implying from your question is that compared to doing things without AI, you are learning less (or perhaps you believe nothing). You definitely are learning less about mucking around in linux. But, if the alternative was not ever running a linux machine at all because you didn't want to deal with running it, you are learning infinitely more.
- croes 9mo agoHow can you review if you don‘t know in the first place? You can watch your doctor, your plumber, your car mechanic and still wouldn’t know if they di something wrong if you don’t know the subject as such.
- doctoboggan 9mo agoYou can learn a lot from watching your doctor, plumber or mechanic work, and you could learn even more if you could ask them questions for hours without making them mad.
- defrost 9mo agoYou learn less from watching a faux-doctor, faux-plumber, faux-mechanic and learn even less by engaging in their hallucinations without a level horizon for reference. Bob the Builder doesn't convey much about drainage needs for foundations and few children think to ask. Who knows how AI-Bob might respond.
- rkomorn 9mo ago> You can learn a lot from watching your doctor [...] work Very true but I'll still opt for that general anesthesia...
- xboxnolifes 9mo agoThe primary way humans learn anything at all is by watching and mimicking. Sure, there will be mistakes, but that doesn't preclude learning.
- ruszki 9mo agoYour hypothetical situation would cause all progress to halt. Nobody would be able to fix genuine problems.