4 ms·
And if you look at body counts over time, Anglo Saxon countries are pretty indiscriminately bloodthirsty, and usually kill with much less provocation. Wow, rac
by Crake 14y ago
And if you look at body counts over time, Anglo Saxon countries are pretty indiscriminately bloodthirsty, and usually kill with much less provocation.
Wow, racist much?
Cruelty isn't copyright caucasian. Plenty of shit has gone down that had nothing to do with europeans.
I still don't condone terrorism and murder, since an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind. I'm sorry you feel that your countrymen are such terrible people that they deserve to die. I'm not the biggest fan of my own country, but I can't say I've ever condoned wholesale slaughter of its citizens.
- ucee054 14y ago>I'm sorry you feel that your countrymen are such terrible people that they deserve to die It personally suits me fine if AlQaeda never existed. >Wow, racist much? Stop personalising it; it's not about me, it's about consistency. See, the Jihadi pulling the trigger doesn't see him self as a "terrorist" committing "murder", he sees himself as a "fighter for freedom" performing "service", much like the Marine on the other side does. That's why I'm trying to be cold-bloodedly objective, otherwise things become just a matter of opinion. So a question for you: If "wholesale slaughter" of innocent civilians is wrong, then will you condemn the strategic bombing of Germany in World War 2? If you condone the strategic bombing of Germany(, or drone strikes in Pakistan), then how can you condemn Jihadi bombings on the basis of "wholesale slaughter"?