3 ms·
Off the top of my head: Windows Vista was slow and unstable on a lot of hardware of the time due to significantly higher system requirements than XP and a new d
by einr 9mo ago
Off the top of my head: Windows Vista was slow and unstable on a lot of hardware of the time due to significantly higher system requirements than XP and a new display driver model that worked poorly at first, had a very polarizing look, and had quite overbearing UAC -- where XP would just let you do the thing, Vista would ask you three times if you're really really sure you wanted to authorize it.
It had decent bones though -- arguably a lot of its bad reputation was due to hardware/third party driver issues and people trying to run it on old hardware that just couldn't hack it. Windows 7 was well received and is basically the same thing with small improvements and some of the UX issues smoothed over (i.e. less annoying UAC)
- overfeed 9mo agoWindows Vista was also notorious for going overboard with translucency effects in the default "Aero" style
- xmddmx 9mo agoMy memory is that it was named "Aero Glass" which heightens the irony of "Liquid Glass" sucking. But I see many references to it being called just "Aero", but some call it "Aero Glass" [1] Does anyone know the truth? [1] https://www.pcmag.com/archive/rip-aero-glass-windows-8-sticks-a-fork-in-familiar-ui-298095 https://www.pcmag.com/archive/rip-aero-glass-windows-8-stick...
- overfeed 9mo agoMicrosoft marketing maybhave had a specific preference, but "Aero" and "Aero Glass" are interchangeable. From the same article you linked: > "Rest in peace, Aero. I liked you, a lot. Still do. And I'll miss you," Thurrott writes