3 ms·
It's a machine. It by definition lacks autonomy. The act may be circuiticiously arrived at, but still. Somebody has to write and run the program.
by analog8374 9mo ago
It's a machine. It by definition lacks autonomy.
The act may be circuiticiously arrived at, but still. Somebody has to write and run the program.
- AndrewKemendo 9mo agoThat kind of dodges my question. I’ll repeat it: Is there any time in the future where you believe a machine or set of machines could measurably out perform a human to the degree that they can coerce or overpower them with no human intervention?
- analog8374 9mo ago(Ya sure, because repeating yourself is always so helpful) well, leaving the "with no human intervention" part, which is a bit fuzzy. Ya sure. AI can already contrive erudite bs arguments at a moment's notice, sell stuff pretty good and shoot guns with great accuracy. Do you?
- AndrewKemendo 9mo agoYes I do So, given that we agree that there will be superhuman robotic systems; would you disagree that such a system, at scale, would be impossible to overcome for human or group of humans?
- analog8374 9mo agoYa don't say. Just state your big hypothesis already.