3 ms·
Matrix published a proof of concept a few years ago of an alternative transport layer designed to work over connections with a few hundred bits per second, and
by p-e-w 9mo ago
Matrix published a proof of concept a few years ago of an alternative transport layer designed to work over connections with a few hundred bits per second, and massive packet loss, while still providing E2EE:
https://matrix.org/blog/2019/03/12/breaking-the-100bps-barrier-with-matrix-meshsim-coap-proxy/ https://matrix.org/blog/2019/03/12/breaking-the-100bps-barri...
- bawolff 9mo agoWithout knowing that much about this area, i think https://mosh.org/ https://mosh.org/ is a traditional choice if you need encrypted communication in a high packet loss environment.
- rurban 9mo agoUDP is certainly not known to improve traffic reliability in those environments. TCP is
- bawolff 9mo agoUDP is build your own reliability layer, so its going to depend on how you use it. [Of course you could say the same thing about TCP i suppose depending on which congestion control algorithm is in use]