5 ms·

The rise of Nazi Germany took roughly 14-16 years, so I'd say we're about right on schedule based on the current timeline. Maybe you should study history more a

The rise of Nazi Germany took roughly 14-16 years, so I'd say we're about right on schedule based on the current timeline. Maybe you should study history more and spew partisan edgelord nonsense less, but you wouldn't really have much of an identity at all then, would you?

frumplestlatz 9mo ago
[flagged]
- willmarch 9mo ago
  The lady doth protest too much, methinks... Struggles with your mental health in the past? Do you want to talk about it? It's nothing to be ashamed of... Also, history might not repeat, but it certainly does rhyme. :)
  - frumplestlatz 9mo ago
    [flagged]
    - willmarch 9mo ago
      Dude, you're practically frothing at the mouth rambling about mental health in nearly every post and talking about some imagined left destabilization of the world. Are you okay? You can ask for help. You don't have to struggle with this obsession by yourself. There are professionals for this sort of thing.
      - frumplestlatz 9mo ago
        > … no amount of facts or evidence would convince you otherwise until their boot is on your own neck > The rise of Nazi Germany took roughly 14-16 years, so I'd say we're about right on schedule based on the current timeline. I appreciate you trying to save face, but this is what you were posting just a few messages up. Pretending to be reasonable works better when we can’t read the detached-from-reality things you were literally just posting. If we were really on the cusp of a new post-Weimar NSDAP Germany, almost any form of resistance would be ethically justified. Is that what you’re claiming?
        willmarch 9mo ago
        It's only natural for you to try to deflect away from discussing your own clear struggles with neurosis and insecurities about your own mental health, but I really do feel like you'd benefit from leaning into this moment and maybe discovering why you're unable to hold a discussion without resorting to overly transparent attempts at painting anyone that disagrees with you as mentally unwell rather than engaging with anything of substance. It speaks to a deeply rooted issue in your psyche where you must project your own fears and worries about your mental health on to others rather than face your own ignorance and a lack of basic maturity that is unbecoming of someone of your age. I'm guessing you struggle to keep longterm relationships because you blame all of your issues on other people rather than being able to self-reflect on your own flaws and, because of your own supreme confidence in your own flawed judgement, it drives everyone away that might care about you. Is it hard to be that miserable and unlikeable? I'm sure it is, but the good news is that you can work on yourself and you can improve your relations with your fellow humans. It is possible to change and grow.
        frumplestlatz 9mo ago
        Now you just seem ridiculous and mentally ill. Let me repeat. If we were really on the cusp of a new post-Weimar NSDAP Germany, almost any form of resistance would be ethically justified. Is that what you’re claiming?
        willmarch 9mo ago
        It’s revealing that you need that little morality-play false dilemma to avoid the actual topic. You’ve used “mentally ill” the way other people use citations: as a substitute for substance. It doesn’t make you the adult in the room, it just makes you look like someone who can’t defend a position without trying to pathologize disagreement. Here’s one fact you can’t hand-wave away: DHS/USCIS is proposing to expand biometrics collection (including DNA) to people merely “associated with” an immigration benefit request (explicitly including petitioners/sponsors/signatories, i.e., often U.S. citizens) regardless of age. So, you can either argue why sweeping citizens into government biometric/DNA collection for paperwork is normal and lawful, or you can keep doing the “everyone who disagrees with me is unstable” routine. One of those is an argument; the other is a tell.

frumplestlatz 9mo ago

[flagged]

willmarch 9mo ago
The lady doth protest too much, methinks... Struggles with your mental health in the past? Do you want to talk about it? It's nothing to be ashamed of... Also, history might not repeat, but it certainly does rhyme. :)
- frumplestlatz 9mo ago
  [flagged]
  - willmarch 9mo ago
    Dude, you're practically frothing at the mouth rambling about mental health in nearly every post and talking about some imagined left destabilization of the world. Are you okay? You can ask for help. You don't have to struggle with this obsession by yourself. There are professionals for this sort of thing.
    - frumplestlatz 9mo ago
      > … no amount of facts or evidence would convince you otherwise until their boot is on your own neck > The rise of Nazi Germany took roughly 14-16 years, so I'd say we're about right on schedule based on the current timeline. I appreciate you trying to save face, but this is what you were posting just a few messages up. Pretending to be reasonable works better when we can’t read the detached-from-reality things you were literally just posting. If we were really on the cusp of a new post-Weimar NSDAP Germany, almost any form of resistance would be ethically justified. Is that what you’re claiming?
      - willmarch 9mo ago
        It's only natural for you to try to deflect away from discussing your own clear struggles with neurosis and insecurities about your own mental health, but I really do feel like you'd benefit from leaning into this moment and maybe discovering why you're unable to hold a discussion without resorting to overly transparent attempts at painting anyone that disagrees with you as mentally unwell rather than engaging with anything of substance. It speaks to a deeply rooted issue in your psyche where you must project your own fears and worries about your mental health on to others rather than face your own ignorance and a lack of basic maturity that is unbecoming of someone of your age. I'm guessing you struggle to keep longterm relationships because you blame all of your issues on other people rather than being able to self-reflect on your own flaws and, because of your own supreme confidence in your own flawed judgement, it drives everyone away that might care about you. Is it hard to be that miserable and unlikeable? I'm sure it is, but the good news is that you can work on yourself and you can improve your relations with your fellow humans. It is possible to change and grow.
        frumplestlatz 9mo ago
        Now you just seem ridiculous and mentally ill. Let me repeat. If we were really on the cusp of a new post-Weimar NSDAP Germany, almost any form of resistance would be ethically justified. Is that what you’re claiming?
        willmarch 9mo ago
        It’s revealing that you need that little morality-play false dilemma to avoid the actual topic. You’ve used “mentally ill” the way other people use citations: as a substitute for substance. It doesn’t make you the adult in the room, it just makes you look like someone who can’t defend a position without trying to pathologize disagreement. Here’s one fact you can’t hand-wave away: DHS/USCIS is proposing to expand biometrics collection (including DNA) to people merely “associated with” an immigration benefit request (explicitly including petitioners/sponsors/signatories, i.e., often U.S. citizens) regardless of age. So, you can either argue why sweeping citizens into government biometric/DNA collection for paperwork is normal and lawful, or you can keep doing the “everyone who disagrees with me is unstable” routine. One of those is an argument; the other is a tell.