2 ms·
That’s throwing the baby with the bathwater, there’s hundreds ways to die not horribly. And for an "immortal" (as in "not-aging"), there’s still ways to die hor
by aziaziazi 9mo ago
That’s throwing the baby with the bathwater, there’s hundreds ways to die not horribly. And for an "immortal" (as in "not-aging"), there’s still ways to die horribly.
Life is more beautiful when you live it for its experiences, not for the fear of loosing it.
- JumpCrisscross 9mo ago> throwing the baby with the bathwater, there’s hundreds ways to die not horribly The baby in your analogy being aging? > there’s still ways to die horribly Sure. The purpose would be remove a common cause of dying horribly. (And in no world with longevity treatments would it be mandatory. People and populations who like aging and Alzheimer’s can keep partying like it’s 2025.)