3 ms·
> “Better at preventing” \neq “can’t”. That's not really relevant. Generally with things that have both good and bad uses you can't reasonably prevent all the
by tzs 10mo ago
> “Better at preventing” \neq “can’t”.
That's not really relevant. Generally with things that have both good and bad uses you can't reasonably prevent all the bad uses. You can just put in safeguards to try to reduce them.
- ls612 10mo agoThis is true for most things but not for CSAM which is a strict liability crime in most places.