4 ms·
> The website IS the repo. The repo IS the website. I wonder if we get something productive by end of 2026 from this repo. Who knows, maybe we solve AGI
by anishgupta 9mo ago
> The website IS the repo. The repo IS the website.
I wonder if we get something productive by end of 2026 from this repo. Who knows, maybe we solve AGI
- Eldodi 9mo agoWould have been even more absurd if code AND PRs were all AI generated by different coding agents
- appplication 9mo agoNothing is stopping that from happening tbh
- jibal 9mo agoIt's not possible to generate anything productive this way.
- lucb1e 9mo agoWikipedia basically works this way. And instead of it being directly public, it goes through a voting process. One might argue it's actually much more curated than Wikipedia :P
- jibal 9mo agoNo, it doesn't work anything like this. > One might argue it's actually much more curated than Wikipedia Well duh. It's vastly more "curated" since Wikipedia isn't curated at all, almost anyone can change anything at any time but changes are supposed to reflect consensus (in theory, but there are numerous rogue agents who violate the rules) and it's a single instance with a linear set of changes that only occur once a week, whereas WP is a seething mass of constant change--but with a tight fitness function due to the (again theoretical) requirement that all changes must reflect reliable sources, not the whims of the editors--totally the opposite of OC. (There are additional policies and various governing groups but these make WP even less like OC). It's beyond absurd to liken OC to WP.