3 ms·
Once upon a time, the SAT an IQ test, and it was a real achievement to score a 1600. That achievement has been hollowed out in tandem with the value of most co
by SR2Z 9mo ago
Once upon a time, the SAT an IQ test, and it was a real achievement to score a 1600. That achievement has been hollowed out in tandem with the value of most college degrees.
We know how to test for merit. The greatest tragedy in this college admissions racket isn't the shadowy affirmative action policies, the mountains of student loan debt, or the entire college admission-industrial complex that's sprung up.
It's that even the tools we've used to use to measure if someone was _ready_ for college have been annihilated.
- hackyhacky 9mo agoThe SAT was never an IQ test, and it certainly doesn't measure "merit", whatever that is. It's a Scholastic Aptitude Test, and it isn't particularly good at that either. If we had a good "test for merit" then we could directly assign people to their roles and ignore their actual performance.
- JumpCrisscross 9mo ago> It's a Scholastic Aptitude Test, and it isn't particularly good at that either It’s a pretty good measure for how a student will do in their first year in college.
- everybodyknows 9mo ago"Aptitude" was dropped from the name back in 1990. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#Name_changes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT#Name_changes It may have become something of a dirty word ...
- JumpCrisscross 9mo ago> the SAT an IQ test You’re thinking of a 2004 study that found “the SAT (and later, with Koenig, the ACT) was substantially correlated with measures of general cognitive ability and could be used as a proxy measure for intelligence” [1]. To my knowledge, this remains the case. [1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6963451/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6963451/
- losvedir 9mo agoTime pressure is a crucial aspect of it, though. I think GP may be alluding to the alleged abuse of disability exceptions, allowing kids (who don't need it) to take longer.