4 ms·

Okay something's wrong with Mistral Large as it seems to be the most contrarian out of everything no matter how much I ask it. Interesting I asked a lot of que

Okay something's wrong with Mistral Large as it seems to be the most contrarian out of everything no matter how much I ask it. Interesting I asked a lot of questions and I am sorry if it might be burning some tokens but I found this website really fascinating. This seems really great and simple to explore the biases within AI models and the UI is extremely well built. Thanks for building it and I wish your project good wishes from my side!

Imustaskforhelp 10mo ago
I asked it if AI is a bubble, yes or no and shockingly (or not shockingly?) only two models said yes and most said no. This is after the fact that even OpenAI admits that its a bubble and just like, we all know its a bubble and I found this fascinating The gist below has a screenshot of it https://gist.github.com/SerJaimeLannister/4da2729a0d2c9848e6c52cb70ad82315 https://gist.github.com/SerJaimeLannister/4da2729a0d2c9848e6...
- fluoridation 10mo ago
  I'm not sure this actually means anything, though. Like, what information is being taken into account to reach their conclusions? How are they reaching their conclusions? Is someone messing with the input to make the models lean in a certain direction? Just knowing which ones said yes and which ones said no doesn't provide a whole lot of information.
  - irishcoffee 10mo ago
    > Like, what information is being taken into account to reach their conclusions? How are they reaching their conclusions? Is someone messing with the input to make the models lean in a certain direction? I say this exact same thing every time I think about using an LLM.
    - fluoridation 10mo ago
      It's pretty funny that the fact we've managed to get a computer to trick us into thinking it thinks without even understanding why it works is causing people to lose their minds.
- jesenator 10mo ago
  Yeah I wouldn't read too much into their response on the AI bubble question. They don't have access to any search tools or recent events so all they know is up until their knowledge cutoff (you can find this date online, if you're interested). Glad you found it fascinating regardless!
jesenator 10mo ago
Thanks so much! I appreciate the kind words.

Imustaskforhelp 10mo ago

I asked it if AI is a bubble, yes or no and shockingly (or not shockingly?) only two models said yes and most said no. This is after the fact that even OpenAI admits that its a bubble and just like, we all know its a bubble and I found this fascinating The gist below has a screenshot of it https://gist.github.com/SerJaimeLannister/4da2729a0d2c9848e6c52cb70ad82315 https://gist.github.com/SerJaimeLannister/4da2729a0d2c9848e6...

fluoridation 10mo ago
I'm not sure this actually means anything, though. Like, what information is being taken into account to reach their conclusions? How are they reaching their conclusions? Is someone messing with the input to make the models lean in a certain direction? Just knowing which ones said yes and which ones said no doesn't provide a whole lot of information.
- irishcoffee 10mo ago
  > Like, what information is being taken into account to reach their conclusions? How are they reaching their conclusions? Is someone messing with the input to make the models lean in a certain direction? I say this exact same thing every time I think about using an LLM.
  - fluoridation 10mo ago
    It's pretty funny that the fact we've managed to get a computer to trick us into thinking it thinks without even understanding why it works is causing people to lose their minds.
jesenator 10mo ago
Yeah I wouldn't read too much into their response on the AI bubble question. They don't have access to any search tools or recent events so all they know is up until their knowledge cutoff (you can find this date online, if you're interested). Glad you found it fascinating regardless!

jesenator 10mo ago

Thanks so much! I appreciate the kind words.