3 ms·
2,000 reads a second is not the same as tens of thousands of rows being updated or inserted a second. MSSQL is also not the bottleneck, flushing data to it is
by benologist 14y ago
2,000 reads a second is not the same as tens of thousands of rows being updated or inserted a second. MSSQL is also not the bottleneck, flushing data to it is decoupled from the requests.
- meaty 14y agoWe do that as well. Our architecture is CQRS based so we're doing massive batched denormalisation and heavy writes.