4 ms·

I am a Service Provider ("Diensteanbieter") according to DDG and I don't block a single page, which makes your statement not only wrong, but rather so wrong tha

by nkmnz 10mo ago

I am a Service Provider ("Diensteanbieter") according to DDG and I don't block a single page, which makes your statement not only wrong, but rather so wrong that not even the complete opposite would make any sense.

cubefox 10mo ago
Not necessarily. Perhaps small service providers are exempt from blocking sci-hub.se. But Cloudflare is certainly not small.
- nkmnz 10mo ago
  Have you ever considered reading the law before attempting to discuss it?
  - cubefox 10mo ago
    You are clearly unable to cite a portion of the law which proves that Cloudflare counts as a service provider.
    - nkmnz 10mo ago
      § 1 Absatz 4 Nummer 5 Digitale-Dienste Gesetz: Im Sinne dieses Gesetzes ist oder sind „Diensteanbieter“ Anbieter digitaler Dienste;
      - cubefox 10mo ago
        That's just stating a tautology.
        nkmnz 10mo ago
        No, it's not. It's a very precise way to state that the law has to be applied to a very wide range of service providers. This is a fundamental change compared to the previous regulation TKG. Now take the loss and next time, read the damn manual first.
        cubefox 9mo ago
        The quote does not decide whether Cloudflare counts as a "service provider" or not.
        nkmnz 9mo ago
        Oh really… then let’s make it obvious: 1. Do they offer any kind of service? YES. 2. Is the service they offer of a digital nature? Also YES. It’s never been easier.