3 ms·
so why haven't they?
by sevenseacat 10mo ago
so why haven't they?
- george_atom 10mo agois there a need?
- eadwu 10mo agoI think you are expecting some kind of collaborative OSS type of library. For LLMs to have replaced Tailwind - in part by using it themselves - this does not have mean that there _will_ be another library to reuse. In the context of LLMs, it becomes so "cheap" to customize the webpage that a library is no longer needed. Tailwind in and of itself can be considered a "highly structured LLM" - if they so took it that far.
- jaapz 10mo agoLooking forward to frontpage/dreamweaver levels of css soup already
- burnt-resistor 10mo agoThe future will gradually become proprietary and non-textual programming languages, toolchains, and runtimes inaccessible to humans.