4 ms·
LLMs could absolutely replace Tailwind, and if there was the need, aid creating something better.
by JKFSOM 9mo ago
LLMs could absolutely replace Tailwind, and if there was the need, aid creating something better.
- sevenseacat 9mo agoso why haven't they?
- george_atom 9mo agois there a need?
- eadwu 9mo agoI think you are expecting some kind of collaborative OSS type of library. For LLMs to have replaced Tailwind - in part by using it themselves - this does not have mean that there _will_ be another library to reuse. In the context of LLMs, it becomes so "cheap" to customize the webpage that a library is no longer needed. Tailwind in and of itself can be considered a "highly structured LLM" - if they so took it that far.
- jaapz 9mo agoLooking forward to frontpage/dreamweaver levels of css soup already
- burnt-resistor 9mo agoThe future will gradually become proprietary and non-textual programming languages, toolchains, and runtimes inaccessible to humans.
- jrm4 9mo agoCould? I'll go a bit further. I am 100% certain they will.