2 ms·
Then lets call this special license something like: No-you-still-dont-have-to-pay-but-any-AI-use-is-restricted-license. 1 This way, everyone knows, its not as
by throwawayqqq11 10mo ago
Then lets call this special license something like:
No-you-still-dont-have-to-pay-but-any-AI-use-is-restricted-license.
1
This way, everyone knows, its not as free as the MIT license and has absolutely no relation to it. /s
Ofcourse you can specialize existing licenses with limited paragraphs and reflect that in their names...
- HumanOstrich 10mo agoI think you're missing the point of the MIT License and its history. If you want a proprietary license, "specializing" the MIT License for that is silly. My grandmother could specialize as a bicycle if I added wheels to her.
- throwawayqqq11 10mo agoYes, the MIT ought to be as broad, free and compatible as possible and is imo targeted to counter copy left licenses but this permissiveness can be also a problem, so specializing it into something like a tagged creative commons license can be a reasonable effort. It depends on the problem/topic of restriction and how narrow or well defined they are.