4 ms·
> On the flip side, I find it shocking that ridership is still only 60% of pre-pandemic levels. My understand is that it's been true of commuter rail everywher
by nxobject 9mo ago
> On the flip side, I find it shocking that ridership is still only 60% of pre-pandemic levels.
My understand is that it's been true of commuter rail everywhere - e.g. a Twin Cities commuter railroad has shut down as well due to declining ridership.
https://www.progressiverailroading.com/passenger_rail/news/Minnesotas-Northstar-Commuter-Rail-ceases-service--76076 https://www.progressiverailroading.com/passenger_rail/news/M...
Here's a relatively rigorous report from the GAO synthesizing cross-US experiences:
https://www.gao.gov/blog/most-commuter-rail-systems-are-still-struggling-post-pandemic https://www.gao.gov/blog/most-commuter-rail-systems-are-stil...
My understanding is that there's a decline in transit use in general, but I would hazard to guess that the emphasis on commuters has hit commuter rail the hardest.
- irjustin 9mo agoAlso WFH is still around. Sure RTO is being forced but it's not universal. Lots of orgs are still hybrid.
- rconti 9mo agoYeah; my bay area job is basically remote (in all but name), but I keep hearing "everyone" had to RTO.
- jasonfarnon 9mo ago" find it shocking that ridership is still only 60% of pre-pandemic levels." Do we know how much of this 47% is due to electrification vs just post-pandemic trend?
- xnx 9mo ago> My understand is that it's been true of commuter rail everywhere Yet, astoundingly, many transit system budgets are higher than ever.