3 ms·
> She accelerated against the officer, hit them That didn't happen; the thing being sold as an impact is the officer dropping his cellphone to shoot her.
by dragonwriter 10mo ago
> She accelerated against the officer, hit them
That didn't happen; the thing being sold as an impact is the officer dropping his cellphone to shoot her.
- cmxch 10mo ago[flagged]
- dragonwriter 10mo ago> intentional impact by the decedent striking the officer with their body cam (not a cell phone) It is a cellphone camera, you can even see where he switches hands in the video, as well as a reflection in the car window of him holding it. Like the rest of your lies, this is incredibly lazy. > And if you simply want to keep trying to justify attempted murder on an ICE officer, The only murder attempt was by the officer, and it was successful. And, even before thet, ICE officers with their very narrowly constrained legal authority had no lawful justification for approaching the vehicle and having one of the officers try to open the door; ICE officers were engaged in criminal misconduct even before escalating to murder.
- grumio 10mo agoThey did do something wrong. Shooting at a vehicle is not self defense. That is a DOJ rule which no doubt you've seen in these several threads you frequent and troll.
- cmxch 10mo ago[flagged]
- cmxch 10mo ago[flagged]
- grumio 10mo ago> they didn’t arrest the co-conspirator that egged the decedent on Glad to see you've abandoned trying to defend your lie that shooting at a vehicle is self-defence and moved on to another nonsense argument. But co-conspirator in what crime? > save that for BlueSky where you can have a safe space. I don't need a safe space from you. Your trolling doesn't affect me.