4 ms·
Does anyone else feel like the LLM-tone of this article makes it difficult to understand what's actually important in it? It's not clear to me if the issue is
by fwip 10mo ago
Does anyone else feel like the LLM-tone of this article makes it difficult to understand what's actually important in it? It's not clear to me if the issue is ongoing (like it says) or that it's been resolved by rotating the API key (like it also says). And that's like, the most basic piece of information the article could have in it.
- oasisbob 10mo agoObviously more than just tone. Based on the lack of structure and wording it's clearly substantially AI written.
- fn-mote 10mo agoThe article mentions two vulnerabilities. One was remediated June 2025. The other has not been remediated.
- chrneu 10mo agoI hate that every article nowadays has to be judged on whether it's AI or not. So annoying.
- fwip 10mo agoI'd like to read stuff written by a human. I know other people like reading LLM output. I don't see what's wrong with telling people whether it's AI-written or not.
- tatersolid 9mo ago> I know other people like reading LLM output. I haven’t met any of these people; I’m sure some may exist but does anyone actually “like” rather than “tolerate” LLM writing? Anybody have a link to a decent study or survey on this area?
- oasisbob 10mo agoFor me it's not about "is this AI", it's "this writing is obnoxious and disrespectful of the reader, and here's why I think AI is likely at the root of it."