4 ms·
> As a customer, you already trust Kagi enough to feed them your entire search history, so I guess you don't think they're bad actors. Do I? I'm not going to p
by hobofan 10mo ago
> As a customer, you already trust Kagi enough to feed them your entire search history, so I guess you don't think they're bad actors.
Do I? I'm not going to post sensitive information into a search engine no matter who runs it.
My search history ain't worth much. What the contents of e.g. my bank website are is.
- EbNar 10mo agoFine. Thank you for the clarification.
- barbazoo 10mo agoThere’s still trusting Kagi that what’s in the binary was built from the open source code right?
- pdpi 10mo agoI can build it myself and skip that step. Or, if the build process is reproducible, you can make trust less of an issue by having a small handful of independent people run their own builds and post their signatures. That way you need those people to all collude with Kagi to forge a bad build. This is how e.g. bitcoind binaries are handled.
- mistercheph 10mo agoWith reproducible builds, and the way most people get packages, from their package manager: No.