2 ms·

And you are downvoted for understanding the issue, of course.

• a456463 10mo ago
  Yup! Which is also the reason why I distrust projects like these in general: bold claims when there is nothing to be backed up with. What else is hiding behind such bold claims?
  • the__alchemist 10mo ago
    The claims, including in comments in this thread read to me as "I will make this claim". Then, someone points out that the claim is inaccurate. "I didn't really mean that, I meant slightly softer version". It feels disingenuous.
    • cyber-crank 10mo ago
      What I'm seeing is an Embassy dev giving hard evidence of how this can be used for real-time tasks ironically proving that the weirdly upset people, who are claiming no one here knows what they are talking about, are in fact the ones who don't know what they are talking about.
      • the__alchemist 10mo ago
        Hey: for this particular thread, the example claim in question is It obsoletes the need for a traditional RTOS, which isn't true. See elsewhere in this comments section as well, there are several good examples.
        • rcxdude 10mo ago
          And you can see plenty of discussions where people claim this but there are plenty of counters from others. I personally think you'd be hard pressed to come up with a situation which an RTOS could do and embassy-rs's approach would be fundamentally incapable of (at least on reasonably modern microcontrollers: as I've been banging on about in other comments: an NVIC is a really useful piece of hardware).