3 ms·
What part of a TOS is ridiculous? Claude Code is obviously a loss leader to them, but developer momentum / market share is important to them and they consider i
by stingraycharles 10mo ago
What part of a TOS is ridiculous? Claude Code is obviously a loss leader to them, but developer momentum / market share is important to them and they consider it worth it.
What part of “OpenCode broke the TOS of something well defined” makes you think it’s all Anthropic’s fault?
- mnky9800n 10mo agoMy guess is that ultimately the use of Claude code will provide the training data to make most of what you do now in Claude code irrelevant.
- FuckButtons 10mo agoMy guess is that ultimately the use of Claude code will provide the training data to make most of what you do irrelevant. FTFY.
- fc417fc802 10mo agoPoor behavior is still poor behavior even if the relevant ToS aligns with it.
- anamexis 10mo agoWhy is it poor behavior though?
- fc417fc802 10mo agoRestricting users from using third party tools is commonly viewed as poor behavior. I'm not inclined to rehash that debate here, although I might respond to specific (contextually relevant) counterpoints if you feel like making them.
- ForHackernews 10mo agoDo you think Anthropic followed all the ToS of every website on the internet when scraping them for training data?
- rovr138 10mo agoYou justify a wrong thing by attacking something else? Is that the only argument?
- ForHackernews 10mo agoI don't feel any need to behave respectfully toward people or institutions that clearly don't respect me.
- landl0rd 10mo agoIt's probably not a "loss-leader" so much as "somewhat lower margin". Their bizdev guys are doubtless happy to make a switch between lower-margin, higher-multiple recurring revenue versus higher-margin, lower-multiple pay-as-you-go API billing. Corporate customers with contracts doubtless aren't paying like that for the API either. This is not uncommon.
- Ajedi32 10mo agoWhen you have a "loss leader" whose sole purpose is to build up market share (e.g. put competitors out of business) that's called predatory pricing.
- epolanski 10mo agoI keep hearing those claims that's they lose money on it, but I have more and more doubts about this being true. GPU compute cost has falled down in the last two years a lot.