3 ms·
This article could really mostly be reduced to the last two paragraphs, but then it calls skills "over-engineered". Skills are basically just having the agent r
by vidarh 10mo ago
This article could really mostly be reduced to the last two paragraphs, but then it calls skills "over-engineered". Skills are basically just having the agent read the front matter with instructions to read the rest if a given skill seems useful in a given context... I don't know how it could be more minimal.
- Myrmornis 10mo agoYes, it reduced the author's credibility; it seems that whatever the accuracy is of some is their MCP criticism, they just like criticizing things.
- jjfoooo4 10mo ago(I'm the author) Looking at the post again, I think I agree that calling Claude Skills overengineered is too harsh. I think Skills is definitely an improvement over MCP. However I still think it's a generally a mistake to put useful commands and documentation in AI-specific files. In my opinion a better approach is to optimize the organization of docs and commands for human usability, and teach the AI how to leverage those. I do use Claude Skills, but only to wire up just commands. I wrote a little package to do this automatically: https://github.com/tombedor/just-claude https://github.com/tombedor/just-claude
- vidarh 10mo agoThere's no reason they need to be treated as AI specific. They're just a description in markdown with a tiny frontmatter after all.