4 ms·
That's the same argument used for banning video games. By killing monsters on the screen you somehow become more violent in real life. Which is comlete bullshit
by usrnm 9mo ago
That's the same argument used for banning video games. By killing monsters on the screen you somehow become more violent in real life. Which is comlete bullshit
- admash 9mo agoThe difference being that sexuality is typically considered an innate desire, whilst the desire to commit violence is not. Plus, we as a species have a biological imperative to protect our offspring, but apparently an immense capacity to ignore violence committed against others.
- scotty79 9mo agoAvailability of pornography correlates with people having less sex not more on average.
- mrbombastic 9mo agoSure but there have also been numerous studies that it does affect sexual behavior and expectations for those that do have sex
- scotty79 9mo agoMonkey see. Monkey do. Nothing surprising here. Once people decide to do something then they model their actions on what they've seen. Even for such innate and strong desires. So completely hands off approach, leaving it to market forces, might not be the best course of action. But banning doesn't seem like a golden bullet either.
- scns 9mo agoThose monsters are virtual ie not real. The people harmed by this are real breathing human beings.
- usrnm 9mo agoI stated it already several times in this thread: my question is not about deepfakes, I can clearly see how those can be harmful. I'm talking about pure computer-generated content, not based on existing people