Content: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46540446 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46540446 You didn't address any of my comments regarding the statem

Content: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46540446 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46540446 You didn't address any of my comments regarding the statements you made. (Didn't even linked Witten-Helffer-Sjöstrand (1982) you referred to. I guess it was an hallucination afterall.) You simply replicated the same statements. Won't be answering further because obviously there's no point. Believe what you want to believe. Or become acceptable to criticism, that maybe your grand AI generated science doesn't hold without becoming obsessive that you're correct, which is how real science moves forward. P.S. Requires multiple people to flag a thread to become dead. Personally won't be flagging/downvoting (edit: cannot downvote anyway replies to own post) this one although should for being very out of context.