12 ms·

well, it's not a high bar – these days anyone who says "I support Palestine Action" or "she was murdered by ICE" is called a terrorist sympathizer

flumpcakes 9mo ago
> these days anyone who says "I support Palestine Action" They have a video of people from this group attacking police with sledgehammers. It is strange how much of this 'direction action' is harming Ukraine support and not Israel. If people wanted to support Palestine they can do it without attacking their own countries' military - which is not operating in Israel at all. > "she was murdered by ICE" They have a video of her being shot, pretty much needlessly. I'd say that should be manslaughter at a minimum.
- Y_Y 9mo ago
  Congratulations, you've reached the level of "terrorist well-wisher"
  - flumpcakes 9mo ago
    Is there something you disagree with? My opinions were pretty neutral.
    - simondotau 9mo ago
      The internet is where every issue is a binary, nuance is scorned, and moderate views are weakness. You should know this already.
      - HPsquared 9mo ago
        It's like Hamlet. "To upvote, or to downvote".
      - iso1631 9mo ago
        "centrist dad" is apparently an insult
        hackable_sand 9mo ago
        The only positive quality to centrists and moderates is their endurance of sledgehammer attacks.
    - Y_Y 9mo ago
      I just felt you didn't quite reach the criteria for "terrorist sympathizer" outlined above. I don't make the rules!
    - megous 9mo ago
      UK military is operating in Palestine (very frequent military flights from their post-colonial base in Cyprus), and is operating in Israel (when they were shooting down drones, etc.), and is supplying Israel with weapons (directly by soldier training and indirectly by allowing to use their military bases), and joined in international coverup (they have detailed intelligence on what Israel was doing in Gaza, which they never released publicly any part of). Pretty solid basis for direct action. If they provided this level of support for Russia, they'd be a new Belarus.
      - dgroshev 9mo ago
        Equating surveillance flights off the coast with "operating in the country" is tenuous at best. If that's the threshold, Russian military is already operating in Britain (see Yantar's adventures). The mental effort a lot of people has made to pretend they aren't entirely powerless and irrelevant for stopping Israel's crimes is deeply impressive. The reality is that there's nothing the UK can do to stop Israel as long as the US is supporting them (short of going to war with both the US and Israel), but this reality is at odds with the desire to do something, so people invent and inflate leverage where there isn't any. Moreover, most of the time the very same people oppose creating more leverage for the future, as your added qualifier of "post-colonial" implies. It's depressing.
        megous 9mo ago
        It's not off the coast, they're circling directly over the territory of Palestine, without invitation from Palestinian state, and against interests of Palestinians. Post-colonial only implies that Cyprus was a UK colony, and now is not, but still retains some bases in there.
- philipwhiuk 9mo ago
  > It is strange how much of this 'direction action' is harming Ukraine support How is direct action on Palestine impacting Ukraine support? (We are also not intervening in Ukraine)
  - flumpcakes 9mo ago
    > (We are also not intervening in Ukraine) Not direct intervention; but we fly sorties, provide intelligence, ship military equipment, build systems for... None of which we provide Israel for their current war. It's just odd to me that Israel draws so much Ire when the UK deals with all sorts. There are many worse things happening that doesn't get a second of airtime.
    - deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
  - temp8830 9mo ago
    > We are also not intervening in Ukraine Hahhahaha. Hahaha. Ha. The cost of this non-intervention is now at almost $200B, is it not? I guess this money went to elves?
- femiagbabiaka 9mo ago
  The UK military is and has been operating in Gaza, the UK government is just lying about it. Public flight tracking data makes it obvious.
  - flumpcakes 9mo ago
    That's a big statement to make - do you have any credible sources on that?
    - barnabee 9mo ago
      At a minimum the RAF has operated hundreds of surveillance flights over Gaza. Multiple sources linked on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_and_the_Gaza_war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_and_the_Gaza_wa...
      - deleted 9mo ago
        [deleted]
      - duggan 9mo ago
        "Robot boots 30,000 feet above the ground" doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
        femiagbabiaka 9mo ago
        I guess those Russian drones in Ukraine aren’t military combatants then?
        flumpcakes 9mo ago
        Well the Russian drones are munitions, so that's not comparable. Is the UK dropping bombs on Gaza? I have seen zero reporting to say they have. The UK might be flying spy planes outside it's airspace when it's citizens were kidnapped. That's not a "combatant". Was the UK a combatant when flying spy planes near the Ukraine border? I think you are way off the mark based on reporting, I'm not even sure how you are coming to these stated opinions.
- gghhzzgghhzz 9mo ago
  "They have a video of people from this group attacking police with sledgehammers" Do you have the name or names of the person accused of 'attacking police with sledgehammers'? I've heard a lot about this, but it's difficult to get to actual sources about exactly what is alleged. Even if this did happen as you say. attachking police with sledgehammers is assault, potentially even attempted murder. There's plenty of laws for that. It's not terrorism.
  - amiga386 9mo ago
    > Do you have the name or names of the person accused of 'attacking police with sledgehammers'? You should be less flippant. The accused's name is Samuel Corner. He and his friends are still on trial for their actions. Here's the bodycam footage where you see Samuel Corner attack police seargent Kate Evans with a sledgehammer while she was on the ground, fracturing her spine. Watch from 3m05s to 3m10s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6P7p_5D4hw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6P7p_5D4hw The police seargent is now disabled: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g54g1r15eo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g54g1r15eo > It's not terrorism. The group's stated aim is to stop the UK or any UK companies giving Israel any military support. They target companies who they think supply Israel. They break in and smash them, and as you've hopefully just seen with your own eyes, they are not afraid to attack people with sledgehammers. They use violence to achieve their political aim. They are terrorists and belong in prison. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dzq41n4l9o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dzq41n4l9o > Samuel Corner, 23, [...] Oxford University graduate from Devon [...] when asked why he struck Sgt Evans with the sledgehammer, he replied: "It was me not really knowing what I was doing Thanks Samuel. That Oxford degree really shows, doesn't it?
    - RugnirViking 9mo ago
      The quote from the article continues. You cut it off. "It was me not really knowing what I was doing, I was trying to protect Leona, or Zoe. I couldn't tell who was screaming." "My friends were in danger and they [the police] were getting quite hands-on. "I remember just feeling like I had to help somehow. I would never think to do that to someone, I was just trying to help," he said. I don't have any opinion on this but I think its important to have the full quote
- 15155 9mo ago
  > They have a video of her being shot Why was her vehicle in gear, engine running?
  - z0r 9mo ago
    Not that your comment is relevant, but why is there a narrative of obstruction when you can visibly see Renee Good wave another truck by moments before she was killed? https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1q7cg7o/minneapolis_ice_shooter_can_be_seen_walking/ https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1q7cg7o/minneapolis_ic...
    - 1234letshaveatw 9mo ago
      See for yourself: https://nypost.com/2026/01/09/us-news/dramatic-footage-from-ice-agents-phone-shows-fiery-confrontation-between-renee-nicole-good-wife-seconds-before-minneapolis-shooting/ https://nypost.com/2026/01/09/us-news/dramatic-footage-from-...
      - z0r 9mo ago
        The newly released footage is truly a political Rorschach test. It is unbelievable to me that anyone without diminished mental capabilities could believe that exonerates the camera man.
- internet_points 9mo ago
  I find it horrifying (though not surprising) how many people can assume that just because you express some level of support for a group, you are complicit in all actions taken by that group. In the extreme, that sort of view makes it impossible to have criminal lawyers. (And not far below that extreme, we have people using all their power to go after independent judges and lawyers with every extrajudicial tool at their disposal, legal system be damned.) The nuance between speech and action was one of the many casualties of social media. I wonder if, back in the 90's, people would get arrested for holding "FREE KEVIN MITNICK" posters, if we'd had two decades of social media before it.
reliabilityguy 9mo ago
> these days anyone who says "I support Palestine Action" You mean the group that sneaked in and damaged a bunch of UK Military’s planes on a military base? Was this the action that put them into the terrorist category?
- _vqpz 9mo ago
  "Damaged a bunch of UK Military's planes" == spray painted two planes
  - veeti 9mo ago
    Spray painting a jet engine causes millions in damages, but it's a cute sleight of hand to insinuate it's just some graffiti on a wall or something.
    - _vqpz 9mo ago
      You don't actually know how much it cost, you just believe what the police say despite the fact that they've provided no figures.
- avianlyric 9mo ago
  Not quite in the same league as IS, Al-Qaeda etc etc. Used to be a organisation had to murder and terrorise an entire population, or fly planes into city centres. Apparently our standards have dropped so low that spray painting a couple of planes and embarrassing the UK military now puts you on par with those other organisations.
  - uhhhd 9mo ago
    Yes supporting the Islamists puts you in the same league as the Islamists.
- amiga386 9mo ago
  Yes. They're a bunch of violent criminals. But that's not the point. There are lots of violent criminals who harm businesses and injure, or even kill people. They should be prosecuted and imprisoned. It's not illegal to say "I support <name of criminal or criminal gang>", even if people strongly disagree with you. However, by showing they could break into an RAF base and spraypaint the planes - that says to me that the RAF are completely shit at their job, how can they protect their base from Russians if they can't even keep out local criminals - embarrassed the Government, and the government retaliated by making it illegal to say you support them. Say it out loud? Criminal. Wear a t-shirt? Criminal. Hold a placard? Criminal. Might as well just hold up blank sheets of paper and wait for the police to arrest you because they know what you want to write on them, like they do in Russia. To me, that's a free speech issue. What an affront to free speech it is. Saying you support criminal scumbags should not be a crime. You should be able to say you support a bunch of violent yahoos, to whoever will listen to you, and I should be able to laugh at you and call you a simpleton for your idiot beliefs.
uhhhd 9mo ago
"Palestine Action" is terrorism.
- Cyph0n 9mo ago
  Spray painting a bunch of airplanes is terrorism. Got it. Oh, and don’t come crying when the same authoritarian laws put in place for Palestine Action are used to label your cause as terrorism to quash dissent.
  - lmc 9mo ago
    Guess you didn't see the footage of them attacking the police with sledgehammers? https://news.sky.com/story/bodycam-footage-of-alleged-sledgehammer-attack-on-police-shown-at-trial-of-palestine-action-activists-13474923 https://news.sky.com/story/bodycam-footage-of-alleged-sledge...
    - Cyph0n 9mo ago
      Even if I hadn’t, I surely would have by now given the amount of “gotchas” in this thread using this crime as some kind of smoking gun justification for proscription. But it is good to know that criminal assault is now equivalent to terrorism.
      - lmc 9mo ago
        Whatever. I suggest you take some time to reflect on your biases. What if a group used similar tactics to try and shut down e.g. gay friendly spaces?
        Cyph0n 9mo ago
        1) Uh.. not terrorism? Hate crime perhaps, but that should be decided by a jury, not unilaterally determined by the gov. 2) So arms manufacturers participating in a war (at best!) are now equivalent to.. gay establishments? I suggest thinking through your examples before sharing them :)
lingrush4 9mo ago
Why are you surprised that people who sympathize with terrorists are called terrorists sympathizers? Roughly 75% of Palestinians support terrorism (the number changes with every survey but it's consistently over 50%). The lady in Minneapolis was using her car as a weapon to impede law enforcement operations. That's not really terrorism; insurrection would be a more accurate description. But she certainly wasn't a good person deserving of any sympathy.
- margalabargala 9mo ago
  > The lady in Minneapolis was using her car as a weapon to impede law enforcement operations. A hysterical take like this isn't really credible. "Obstruction", sure, but calling a stopped vehicle a "weapon" because it's slightly in the way defies the English language to the point where you damage your own credibility. It would be equivalent to call this comment a "weapon" I'm using to impede you announcing your opinion unopposed. She's absolutely deserving of sympathy; she was killed unjustly. We don't have a law on the books allowing capital punishment for parking a vehicle somewhere law enforcement finds it inconvenient. Just because you happen not to agree with her actions at the time, illegal or no, doesn't imply "and therefore she deserved death". I suggest you consider the consequences to your own self of people applying your own logic to you, and how long you would last if this was the general state of affairs.
veeti 9mo ago
I'll do you one better: Palestine Action is bankrolled by notorious pro-Russia tankie Fergie Chambers, who supports Vladimir Putin's genocidal campaign in Ukraine. So please add genocide sympathizer to your list. [1] https://lamag.com/news/cox-family-heir-james-fergie-chambers-funding-palestine-action-in-exclusive-funding-palestinian-action-us/ https://lamag.com/news/cox-family-heir-james-fergie-chambers...

flumpcakes 9mo ago

> these days anyone who says "I support Palestine Action" They have a video of people from this group attacking police with sledgehammers. It is strange how much of this 'direction action' is harming Ukraine support and not Israel. If people wanted to support Palestine they can do it without attacking their own countries' military - which is not operating in Israel at all. > "she was murdered by ICE" They have a video of her being shot, pretty much needlessly. I'd say that should be manslaughter at a minimum.

Y_Y 9mo ago
Congratulations, you've reached the level of "terrorist well-wisher"
- flumpcakes 9mo ago
  Is there something you disagree with? My opinions were pretty neutral.
  - simondotau 9mo ago
    The internet is where every issue is a binary, nuance is scorned, and moderate views are weakness. You should know this already.
    - HPsquared 9mo ago
      It's like Hamlet. "To upvote, or to downvote".
    - iso1631 9mo ago
      "centrist dad" is apparently an insult
      - hackable_sand 9mo ago
        The only positive quality to centrists and moderates is their endurance of sledgehammer attacks.
  - Y_Y 9mo ago
    I just felt you didn't quite reach the criteria for "terrorist sympathizer" outlined above. I don't make the rules!
  - megous 9mo ago
    UK military is operating in Palestine (very frequent military flights from their post-colonial base in Cyprus), and is operating in Israel (when they were shooting down drones, etc.), and is supplying Israel with weapons (directly by soldier training and indirectly by allowing to use their military bases), and joined in international coverup (they have detailed intelligence on what Israel was doing in Gaza, which they never released publicly any part of). Pretty solid basis for direct action. If they provided this level of support for Russia, they'd be a new Belarus.
    - dgroshev 9mo ago
      Equating surveillance flights off the coast with "operating in the country" is tenuous at best. If that's the threshold, Russian military is already operating in Britain (see Yantar's adventures). The mental effort a lot of people has made to pretend they aren't entirely powerless and irrelevant for stopping Israel's crimes is deeply impressive. The reality is that there's nothing the UK can do to stop Israel as long as the US is supporting them (short of going to war with both the US and Israel), but this reality is at odds with the desire to do something, so people invent and inflate leverage where there isn't any. Moreover, most of the time the very same people oppose creating more leverage for the future, as your added qualifier of "post-colonial" implies. It's depressing.
      - megous 9mo ago
        It's not off the coast, they're circling directly over the territory of Palestine, without invitation from Palestinian state, and against interests of Palestinians. Post-colonial only implies that Cyprus was a UK colony, and now is not, but still retains some bases in there.
philipwhiuk 9mo ago
> It is strange how much of this 'direction action' is harming Ukraine support How is direct action on Palestine impacting Ukraine support? (We are also not intervening in Ukraine)
- flumpcakes 9mo ago
  > (We are also not intervening in Ukraine) Not direct intervention; but we fly sorties, provide intelligence, ship military equipment, build systems for... None of which we provide Israel for their current war. It's just odd to me that Israel draws so much Ire when the UK deals with all sorts. There are many worse things happening that doesn't get a second of airtime.
  - deleted 9mo ago
    [deleted]
- temp8830 9mo ago
  > We are also not intervening in Ukraine Hahhahaha. Hahaha. Ha. The cost of this non-intervention is now at almost $200B, is it not? I guess this money went to elves?
femiagbabiaka 9mo ago
The UK military is and has been operating in Gaza, the UK government is just lying about it. Public flight tracking data makes it obvious.
- flumpcakes 9mo ago
  That's a big statement to make - do you have any credible sources on that?
  - barnabee 9mo ago
    At a minimum the RAF has operated hundreds of surveillance flights over Gaza. Multiple sources linked on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_and_the_Gaza_war https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_and_the_Gaza_wa...
    - deleted 9mo ago
      [deleted]
    - duggan 9mo ago
      "Robot boots 30,000 feet above the ground" doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
      - femiagbabiaka 9mo ago
        I guess those Russian drones in Ukraine aren’t military combatants then?
        flumpcakes 9mo ago
        Well the Russian drones are munitions, so that's not comparable. Is the UK dropping bombs on Gaza? I have seen zero reporting to say they have. The UK might be flying spy planes outside it's airspace when it's citizens were kidnapped. That's not a "combatant". Was the UK a combatant when flying spy planes near the Ukraine border? I think you are way off the mark based on reporting, I'm not even sure how you are coming to these stated opinions.
gghhzzgghhzz 9mo ago
"They have a video of people from this group attacking police with sledgehammers" Do you have the name or names of the person accused of 'attacking police with sledgehammers'? I've heard a lot about this, but it's difficult to get to actual sources about exactly what is alleged. Even if this did happen as you say. attachking police with sledgehammers is assault, potentially even attempted murder. There's plenty of laws for that. It's not terrorism.
- amiga386 9mo ago
  > Do you have the name or names of the person accused of 'attacking police with sledgehammers'? You should be less flippant. The accused's name is Samuel Corner. He and his friends are still on trial for their actions. Here's the bodycam footage where you see Samuel Corner attack police seargent Kate Evans with a sledgehammer while she was on the ground, fracturing her spine. Watch from 3m05s to 3m10s: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6P7p_5D4hw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6P7p_5D4hw The police seargent is now disabled: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g54g1r15eo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g54g1r15eo > It's not terrorism. The group's stated aim is to stop the UK or any UK companies giving Israel any military support. They target companies who they think supply Israel. They break in and smash them, and as you've hopefully just seen with your own eyes, they are not afraid to attack people with sledgehammers. They use violence to achieve their political aim. They are terrorists and belong in prison. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dzq41n4l9o https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dzq41n4l9o > Samuel Corner, 23, [...] Oxford University graduate from Devon [...] when asked why he struck Sgt Evans with the sledgehammer, he replied: "It was me not really knowing what I was doing Thanks Samuel. That Oxford degree really shows, doesn't it?
  - RugnirViking 9mo ago
    The quote from the article continues. You cut it off. "It was me not really knowing what I was doing, I was trying to protect Leona, or Zoe. I couldn't tell who was screaming." "My friends were in danger and they [the police] were getting quite hands-on. "I remember just feeling like I had to help somehow. I would never think to do that to someone, I was just trying to help," he said. I don't have any opinion on this but I think its important to have the full quote
15155 9mo ago
> They have a video of her being shot Why was her vehicle in gear, engine running?
- z0r 9mo ago
  Not that your comment is relevant, but why is there a narrative of obstruction when you can visibly see Renee Good wave another truck by moments before she was killed? https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1q7cg7o/minneapolis_ice_shooter_can_be_seen_walking/ https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1q7cg7o/minneapolis_ic...
  - 1234letshaveatw 9mo ago
    See for yourself: https://nypost.com/2026/01/09/us-news/dramatic-footage-from-ice-agents-phone-shows-fiery-confrontation-between-renee-nicole-good-wife-seconds-before-minneapolis-shooting/ https://nypost.com/2026/01/09/us-news/dramatic-footage-from-...
    - z0r 9mo ago
      The newly released footage is truly a political Rorschach test. It is unbelievable to me that anyone without diminished mental capabilities could believe that exonerates the camera man.
internet_points 9mo ago
I find it horrifying (though not surprising) how many people can assume that just because you express some level of support for a group, you are complicit in all actions taken by that group. In the extreme, that sort of view makes it impossible to have criminal lawyers. (And not far below that extreme, we have people using all their power to go after independent judges and lawyers with every extrajudicial tool at their disposal, legal system be damned.) The nuance between speech and action was one of the many casualties of social media. I wonder if, back in the 90's, people would get arrested for holding "FREE KEVIN MITNICK" posters, if we'd had two decades of social media before it.

reliabilityguy 9mo ago

> these days anyone who says "I support Palestine Action" You mean the group that sneaked in and damaged a bunch of UK Military’s planes on a military base? Was this the action that put them into the terrorist category?

_vqpz 9mo ago
"Damaged a bunch of UK Military's planes" == spray painted two planes
- veeti 9mo ago
  Spray painting a jet engine causes millions in damages, but it's a cute sleight of hand to insinuate it's just some graffiti on a wall or something.
  - _vqpz 9mo ago
    You don't actually know how much it cost, you just believe what the police say despite the fact that they've provided no figures.
avianlyric 9mo ago
Not quite in the same league as IS, Al-Qaeda etc etc. Used to be a organisation had to murder and terrorise an entire population, or fly planes into city centres. Apparently our standards have dropped so low that spray painting a couple of planes and embarrassing the UK military now puts you on par with those other organisations.
- uhhhd 9mo ago
  Yes supporting the Islamists puts you in the same league as the Islamists.
amiga386 9mo ago
Yes. They're a bunch of violent criminals. But that's not the point. There are lots of violent criminals who harm businesses and injure, or even kill people. They should be prosecuted and imprisoned. It's not illegal to say "I support <name of criminal or criminal gang>", even if people strongly disagree with you. However, by showing they could break into an RAF base and spraypaint the planes - that says to me that the RAF are completely shit at their job, how can they protect their base from Russians if they can't even keep out local criminals - embarrassed the Government, and the government retaliated by making it illegal to say you support them. Say it out loud? Criminal. Wear a t-shirt? Criminal. Hold a placard? Criminal. Might as well just hold up blank sheets of paper and wait for the police to arrest you because they know what you want to write on them, like they do in Russia. To me, that's a free speech issue. What an affront to free speech it is. Saying you support criminal scumbags should not be a crime. You should be able to say you support a bunch of violent yahoos, to whoever will listen to you, and I should be able to laugh at you and call you a simpleton for your idiot beliefs.

uhhhd 9mo ago

"Palestine Action" is terrorism.

Cyph0n 9mo ago
Spray painting a bunch of airplanes is terrorism. Got it. Oh, and don’t come crying when the same authoritarian laws put in place for Palestine Action are used to label your cause as terrorism to quash dissent.
- lmc 9mo ago
  Guess you didn't see the footage of them attacking the police with sledgehammers? https://news.sky.com/story/bodycam-footage-of-alleged-sledgehammer-attack-on-police-shown-at-trial-of-palestine-action-activists-13474923 https://news.sky.com/story/bodycam-footage-of-alleged-sledge...
  - Cyph0n 9mo ago
    Even if I hadn’t, I surely would have by now given the amount of “gotchas” in this thread using this crime as some kind of smoking gun justification for proscription. But it is good to know that criminal assault is now equivalent to terrorism.
    - lmc 9mo ago
      Whatever. I suggest you take some time to reflect on your biases. What if a group used similar tactics to try and shut down e.g. gay friendly spaces?
      - Cyph0n 9mo ago
        1) Uh.. not terrorism? Hate crime perhaps, but that should be decided by a jury, not unilaterally determined by the gov. 2) So arms manufacturers participating in a war (at best!) are now equivalent to.. gay establishments? I suggest thinking through your examples before sharing them :)

lingrush4 9mo ago

Why are you surprised that people who sympathize with terrorists are called terrorists sympathizers? Roughly 75% of Palestinians support terrorism (the number changes with every survey but it's consistently over 50%). The lady in Minneapolis was using her car as a weapon to impede law enforcement operations. That's not really terrorism; insurrection would be a more accurate description. But she certainly wasn't a good person deserving of any sympathy.

margalabargala 9mo ago
> The lady in Minneapolis was using her car as a weapon to impede law enforcement operations. A hysterical take like this isn't really credible. "Obstruction", sure, but calling a stopped vehicle a "weapon" because it's slightly in the way defies the English language to the point where you damage your own credibility. It would be equivalent to call this comment a "weapon" I'm using to impede you announcing your opinion unopposed. She's absolutely deserving of sympathy; she was killed unjustly. We don't have a law on the books allowing capital punishment for parking a vehicle somewhere law enforcement finds it inconvenient. Just because you happen not to agree with her actions at the time, illegal or no, doesn't imply "and therefore she deserved death". I suggest you consider the consequences to your own self of people applying your own logic to you, and how long you would last if this was the general state of affairs.

veeti 9mo ago

I'll do you one better: Palestine Action is bankrolled by notorious pro-Russia tankie Fergie Chambers, who supports Vladimir Putin's genocidal campaign in Ukraine. So please add genocide sympathizer to your list. [1] https://lamag.com/news/cox-family-heir-james-fergie-chambers-funding-palestine-action-in-exclusive-funding-palestinian-action-us/ https://lamag.com/news/cox-family-heir-james-fergie-chambers...