2 ms·

I'm not sure I understand this article, but the argument you present seems to be that when considering P and NP as relational objects, they don't have the same

I'm not sure I understand this article, but the argument you present seems to be that when considering P and NP as relational objects, they don't have the same signature, thus cannot be compared, so the statement "P = NP" is meaningless?

AnonymousXipang 9mo ago
“Not comparable” doesn’t necessarily mean “meaningless.” Focusing on the structure behind “=” can give a different view. If you want to explore it further, a place more suited to longer, multi-angle discussion would probably work better than here.