So the kids died as a result of the action taken (withdrawing meds from impoverished children), but the person who took the meds away from the sick kids who the

So the kids died as a result of the action taken (withdrawing meds from impoverished children), but the person who took the meds away from the sick kids who then died as a result is innocent? I feel like you might want to look at that word "sophistry" long and hard, and do a bit of soul searching.